Red Natura 2000

Main Menu

  • Special Conservation Zones
  • Protection For Birds
  • Habitats Directive
  • Fauna And Flora
  • Capital

Red Natura 2000

Header Banner

Red Natura 2000

  • Special Conservation Zones
  • Protection For Birds
  • Habitats Directive
  • Fauna And Flora
  • Capital
Habitats Directive
Home›Habitats Directive›Impact on Northern harriers not assessed in Offaly forestry project, court said

Impact on Northern harriers not assessed in Offaly forestry project, court said

By Joyce B. Buchanan
July 1, 2021
0
0



A challenge in the High Court to overturn licenses for a forestry project at a site in Co Offaly has been taken on grounds including the potential impact on the endangered Northern Harrier.

The site is in the Slieve Bloom Special Protection Area (SPA) for birds and it is claimed that the licenses lack measures to avoid disturbing the Northern Harrier, for which the area was designated under the guidelines. Habitats, or the Merlin, the smallest raptor, as required by the Birds Directive.

Other reasons include the alleged lack of strategic environmental assessment and proper assessment of state-owned Coillte’s national forest planning.

The action concerns permits granted to Coillte to fell 11.71 hectares mainly of Sitka spruce at a site in Sheskin, Co Offaly, in the Clonaslee Forest, about 2.5 km from the village of Cadamstown, and to replant entirely cleared land with Sitka spruce trees.

Replanting scheme

Judge Charles Meenan has been informed that the logging operation has been carried out, but the applicants do not have a specific date for the site’s replanting program.

This week it authorized James Devlin SC, for environmentalist Peter Sweetman, of Rossport South, Ballina, Co Mayo, and environmental consultant Neil Foulkes, of Miskaun, Ballinamore, Co Leitrim, to initiate judicial review proceedings aimed at cancel licenses.

The lawsuits are directed against the Minister of Agriculture, Food and Marine, who granted the permits in May 2020, and the Forestry Appeals Committee (FAC), which upheld the minister’s decision last January. Coillte Teo is a part of notice.

The licenses, issued under the Forestry Act of 2014, gave Coillte until December 31, 2020 to fell the 11.71 hectares of Sitka spruce and some existing broadleaf trees and plant trees of Sitka spruce on land cleared within two years of the end of harvesting.

In requesting permission, Mr Devlin said the site was located in an SPA for birds, but it appeared that respondents only considered historical records of St. Martin’s nests in the area and n had not contacted the National Parks and Wildlife Service regarding the current position. It seems the position has been taken, if the NPWS raised an issue, respondents would do something about it, which is not the right approach, he said.

Other grounds for contestation allege failures in the selection and evaluation process and the absence of a Natura impact study, he stressed.

Since the FAC is appointed by and reports to the Minister, the applicants also claim that they have not been subject to an independent review of the merits of the licensing decisions, as required by law. European.

No strategic environmental assessment

In an affidavit, Mr. Foulkes stated that Mr. Sweetman had previously initiated proceedings to protect the Northern Harrier in the SPA and that both applicants participated in the license appeal process.

Ireland

The Leitrim Group challenges the authorization to machine Sitka Sp …

Coillte manages around 331 state forests in Ireland, divided into six Business Area Units. (BAU), he said. A strategic plan has been published for each BAU, but it appears that no strategic environmental assessment has ever been carried out on Coillte’s national forest planning and that no appropriate assessment has been carried out at the strategic planning level in accordance with to the Habitats Directive, he said.

The environmental impacts of this project, in combination with other plans and projects in the same forest or neighboring forests managed by Coillte and other loggers “have not been assessed correctly at all”, a- he declared.

A forest inspector did not explain the reasons for various findings, including the project area does not contain habitats or species listed as qualified special area of ​​conservation interests in the absence of studies on the site specific fauna and when it is said that there is a direct route to SAC via streams or rivers, none of which have been investigated for the presence of otters, did he declares.



Related posts:

  1. SUPRCARE launches the first reusable silver-based antiviral surgical mask that kills viruses on contact
  2. Developing a sustainable blue economy in the European Union – Eurasia Review
  3. Farmers join forces to protect part of the Caha River
  4. Luggala peatlands will be restored to support carbon capture and biodiversity

Recent Posts

  • Local businesses have proposed to turn the Bowdon Hotel into a ‘multi-generational’ development with accommodation, a care home and a crèche
  • Green groups say bird species need habitat protection
  • Amid protests, Kerala to seek amendment of Supreme Court directive on environmentally sensitive areas
  • Anythink Libraries to Build a Nature Library
  • New flower species discovered at Monroe County Bioblitz Nature Preserve

Archives

  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021

Categories

  • Capital
  • Fauna And Flora
  • Habitats Directive
  • Protection For Birds
  • Special Conservation Zones
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy