Red Natura 2000

Main Menu

  • Special Conservation Zones
  • Protection For Birds
  • Habitats Directive
  • Fauna And Flora
  • Capital

Red Natura 2000

Header Banner

Red Natura 2000

  • Special Conservation Zones
  • Protection For Birds
  • Habitats Directive
  • Fauna And Flora
  • Capital
Habitats Directive
Home›Habitats Directive›Opponent calls for permission for Intel’s Irish expansion in violation of EU guidelines

Opponent calls for permission for Intel’s Irish expansion in violation of EU guidelines

By Joyce B. Buchanan
May 12, 2021
0
0



The High Court has started hearing a challenge from a local man to quash the authorization for a € 3.76 billion expansion of the Intel Ireland plant in Co Kildare.

Thomas Reid says the project will expand Intel’s 160-acre campus to 30 acres, take more than four years to build, and involve two years of rock mining to bring the structures up to training level.

At the operational stage, environmental emissions will increase, there has been no proper consideration of what is effectively large-scale quarrying and no information prior to An Bord Pleanála on the entire project, he claims. -he.

In discussions today with James Devlin SC, with Margaret Heavey BL, commissioned by Brian Harrington, for Mr Reid, Judge Richard Humphreys said he would consider visiting the site.

Mr Devlin, who had made submissions regarding the project’s potential impact on sites protected under the EU’s Habitats Directive, said his side would welcome a visit.

Supreme Court decision

Mr Reid won a landmark 2015 Supreme Court ruling preventing the use of mandatory purchase orders for his 29-acre Hensor House farm, which dates back to the mid-1700s.
His house is located approximately 500 meters west of the proposed development site.

Mr Reid’s judicial review challenge over An Bord Pleanala’s November 2019 authorization for Intel’s plant expansion, which opened this week before Judge Humphreys, is taking place on a more limited basis than he would have liked.

This follows from the fact that Humphreys J. partially granted Intel’s preliminary request, supported by the chamber, to exclude certain evidence on which it wished to rely.

The judge did so for reasons such as Mr Reid did not raise certain issues with council when he appealed for permission from Kildare County Council for the extension.

Ineligible

He also found that certain material provided in the affidavits filed for Mr. Reid was inadmissible as it was new substantive scientific evidence. He admitted some, but not all, of the evidence of a research scientist, an expert on lichens and bryophytes (moss-like plants) filed in Mr Reid’s name.

In his challenge, Mr Reid claims that the council’s permission was granted contrary to the requirements of various EU directives and related Irish law. The directives in question are the “Habitats”, “Environmental impact studies” and Seveso (Control of the risks of major accidents involving dangerous substances) directives.

He says Intel’s manufacturing plant adjoins the Rye River Valley / Carton Special Conservation Area, which has conservation goals, including for bryophytes. He claims that there is a risk to this site related to emissions if it is not properly mitigated.

His case is against the Council, represented by Rory Mulcahy SC. Intel, represented by Brian Kennedy SC, is a notification party.

Dublin Bay

By opposing the action, the chamber rejects the allegations, including the allegations that it acted contrary to the guidelines. He said he considered that there was no likelihood that the development would have a significant effect on four European sites in Dublin Bay.

He was also convinced, after carrying out a proper assessment, that the development would not adversely affect the integrity of the Rye / Carton River Valley SCC given the conservation objectives of this site. He denies having failed to make assessments based on the best scientific knowledge in the field.

The case is proceedings before Judge Humphreys via a telescopic hearing, involving an application for leave for judicial review and the case on the merits being heard together.

The judge, who heard lengthy submissions early on regarding the scope of the hearing, said he would not reverse his April ruling on Intel’s request to exclude certain evidence.

The case continues Thursday.



Related posts:

  1. SUPRCARE launches the first reusable silver-based antiviral surgical mask that kills viruses on contact
  2. Developing a sustainable blue economy in the European Union – Eurasia Review
  3. Farmers join forces to protect part of the Caha River
  4. Luggala peatlands will be restored to support carbon capture and biodiversity

Recent Posts

  • Nigerian Oil Bandits and a Blind Regime
  • Ministry confirms that forests are protected
  • Avian influenza detected in Walla Walla County, self-reporting of flock health in surveillance areas encouraged
  • Other Proposed Improvements to Tullamore City Park
  • In search of blackbucks, locals seek reservation in Vijayapura – The New Indian Express

Archives

  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021

Categories

  • Capital
  • Fauna And Flora
  • Habitats Directive
  • Protection For Birds
  • Special Conservation Zones
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy